Previous Page  11 / 86 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 86 Next Page
Page Background

RACING AUSTRALIA ANNUAL REPORT 2016

| 9

5. NORFOLK ISLAND GAMING AUTHORITY

Racing Australia also engaged effectively with the

Federal Government on another threat to racing’s

integrity which arose from an unexpected source.

Racing Australia learnt on 22 March, 2015 that the

Norfolk Island Gaming Authority (NIGA) had approved

a white-label agreement between BetHQ and Asia’s

largest illegal bookmaker Citibet. It was a staggering

act of regulatory recklessness which potentially

exposed Australian racing to corrupt influences. Racing

Australia made urgent representations to the Federal

Government calling for NIGA be wound up as it could

never operate as a competent and reliable regulator.

The Minister for Territories acted decisively and issued

a Direction on 7 April, 2015 prohibiting the NIGA from

issuing any further licences until an independent audit

of its functions and operations had been undertaken.

On 5 November, 2016 the Federal Government

announced the winding up of NIGA after receipt of the

audit which found that the internal controls of NIGA

were inadequate and could give rise to fraud and

corruption. The audit further found:

• “The Authority has been operating in a non-

transparent way with little to no reporting or

communication with the Administration.”

• “The Authority has been grossly under-resourced.

Basic control elements are not in place, such

as: governance and reporting structures, a risk

register, contracts with key personnel, segregation

of duties, controls to prevent conflicts of interest,

staff remuneration processes and policies and

procedures.”

• “The Authority and the former Administration have

been more concerned about raising revenue from

gaming licences than having due regard to its

regulatory functions.”

• “We found the Authority in its current form to be

barely viable.”

In its announcement the Government acknowledged

the concerns of Racing Australia, Racing Victoria and

Racing NSW around NIGA’s poor performance and lack

of probity checks on new licence applications.

6. ASIC CLASS ORDER – HORSE RACING

SYNDICATES

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission

(ASIC) announced in November 2014 that it was

undertaking a review into whether the Horse

Syndication Class Order should continue beyond its

sunset date of 1 October, 2016 and, if so, under what

conditions.

Racing Australia engaged in constructive discussions

with ASIC representing all Principal Racing Authorities

which are lead regulators for the approval of

syndications. There were numerous interactions

with ASIC as various options for reforming the Class

Order were considered. Racing Australia made many

submissions to ASIC on the complex policy, legal and

administrative issues under consideration.

On 31 August, 2016 ASIC announced a new legislative

instrument to replace three Class Orders on Horse

racing syndicates and Horse breeding schemes that

were due to expire in 2016.

Racing Australia welcomed ASIC’s announcement as

it incorporated most if not all of Racing Australia’s key

policy objectives.

ASIC’s major changes to Horse racing syndicates will:

1. Raise the investment limit for a horse racing syndicate

from $250,000 to $500,000;

2. Increase the maximum number of members for a

horse racing syndicate from 20 to 50; and

3. Impose additional content requirements for a Product

Disclosure Statement for a horse racing syndicate.

Racing Australia believes ASIC’s reforms will encourage

greater participation in horse ownership with enhanced

transparency.

The increase to 50 members in a syndicate will make

racing a horse a more affordable option with purchasers

able to acquire a smaller percentage share in a horse.

The cost to purchase and race a horse has increased

since the inception of the original Class Order in 2002.

The increase to 50 members will encourage greater

participation by small owners.

Approved syndicators will also benefit from the new

$500,000 cap as they will have greater purchasing

choices and opportunities at the major yearling sales.

This will also allow participants to purchase a more

affordable share in a well-bred horse.